|
The following case studies are examples of how M.O.P. Systems has provided
solutions to typical scenarios:
Case History #1 – productivity tracking
Case History #2 – cost control
Case History #3 – manpower reductions
Case History #4 – growth planning and execution
Case History #5 – communication
Case History #6 – productivity improvement
|
Case History #1 – productivity tracking
Opportunity: Management and plant employees didn’t know until the
next day whether they had a good day or not. Eliminating the ability
to fix problems on a real time basis.
Actions Taken: A short interval scheduling system (SIS) was developed
and implemented. Standards of performance for all lines were established
and employee buy-in made them part of the solution. Daily posting
of results against goals was established. A feedback system was
put into place.
Results: SIS system allowed for hourly adjustments to production
needs. Operating efficiency increased from an average of 50% to
85%. Mechanical downtime was reduced by 85%.
[back to top]
|
|
Case History #2 – cost control
Opportunity: High rework levels severely impacted profitability.
Excessive waste was being generated at the filling station (hundreds
of cases per day).
Actions Taken: Reviewed crewing requirements and job function.
Identified Direct Labor and Indirect Labor personnel and responsibilities.
Identified machine problem that caused the waste. Spent money to
repair the machine. Identified a crew of 45 people whose sole job
was to rework defective product.
Results: Defect rates, on the filling line, went from +100 cases
per shift to less than 10 cases. This generated a cost savings of
+$250,000 per year. Elimination of the bulk of the defects allowed
for crewing reductions and further cost savings.
[back to top]
|
|
Case History #3 – manpower reductions
Opportunity: High union labor costs were making the company non-competitive
in the marketplace.
Actions Taken: Reviewed payroll and line crewing schedules. Established
crewing and line throughput standards for all products. Implemented
a SIS program to track throughput performance on an hourly basis.
Called plant wide meetings launching the new standards of performance
program. Installed new processing and packaging lines. Implemented
competency testing for all employees.
Results: Headcount (direct and indirect) was reduced from 350 to
175 employees. With manpower decreased by about 50%, a huge saving
in administrative costs was realised. Savings: $3,000,000 in labor
expense.
[back to top]
|
|
Case History #4 – growth planning and execution
Opportunity: The seasonal grape harvest was projected to be at
record levels, far exceeding plant capacity. The fear was that it
could not be processed on time?
Actions Taken: A grape harvest preparedness plan was developed
and implemented in coordination with QA, Operations, Maintenance
and Engineering. Process flows documented all steps including all
risk points with suitable alternate steps. Physical inspection of
all risk points was conducted. 6 Weekly status meetings facilitated
ownership and team building. Test runs and challenge studies confirmed
reliability.
Results: 7 production records were set during the largest grape
harvest in company history (40 days non-stop).
Records included:
- Largest harvest on record (~40,000 tons)
- Highest average tonnage per day (1,000)
- Highest peak tonnage (1,300 tons/day) at record levels
- Lowest level of mechanical downtime
- Best safety record for any grape harvest
[back to top]
|
|
Case History #5 – communication
Opportunity: Lack of communication between departments was causing
in-efficiencies in company operations
Actions Taken: Identified key personnel in each department as team
members to focus on growth and customer service. Established weekly
targets by department. Focused all departmental goals into company
growth plan.
Results: Reduced COG’s by 40%. Implemented National expansion by
adding 14 stores in 18 months.
[back to top]
|
|
Case History #6 – productivity improvement
Opportunity: Operations was given the responsibility to increase
productivity and improve customer service, but was stymied by resistance
to change from support departments.
Actions Taken: Departmental meetings were scheduled to identify
conflicts and next steps. Prioritization of requirements. Established
relevancy for each department and how it affected supporting groups.
Focused on results and overcoming obstacles to change. Treated obstacles
as a symptom not the problem.
Results: Intradepartmental communication was enhanced. Productivity
increased through improved scheduling and waste reduction. Increased
gross profit by $4,300,000.
[back to top]
|
|